A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is thought to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort gambling enterprises within the next few years.
Prior to that video gaming expansion, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a research that gives a baseline for their state of gambling within the state now, one that may then be used to trace changes in longterm studies.
The study, which comes from the class of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed nearly 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That’s sufficient to make it the biggest gambling research ever completed in the United States.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study was praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who said so it should provide an objective way to understand how a state has been impacted by gambling going forward.
‘The most essential point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that could be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track changes in those variables throughout the entire life of the gambling enterprises in order to know up to a certainty the effects also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire september.
The result was a wealth of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
For instance, it turns out that about 72 percent of respondents reported gambling at least onetime within the year that is past.
Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) said they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they had gone to a casino during the past 12 months.
Residents Like Casinos, However Locally
One topic that is hot the region was how Massachusetts’ new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are right to be worried: 65 percent of these Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down when the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked into exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or more to three casinos that no deposit bonus codes planet 7 oz are full-scale. The answer was the one that has been heard in many communities through the entire state: not in my own backyard.
A good 59 percent most of adults in Massachusetts said which they think gambling expansion will either have a impact that is neutral be good for the state.
But, 46 percent think that gambling expansion would be harmful within their very own community, while only 28 percent believe casino expansion would be useful locally.
The study additionally discovered that illegal gambling was fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming sites.
More in-depth analysis of the data gathered is anticipated to be released within the months to come. However, principal investigator Rachel Volberg states that the true value in this survey ended up being gathering information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize just how unusual it is for a problem gambling study to be completed before some new kind of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is lucky that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported this kind of effort and I also am excited to share our findings before any gambling enterprises begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) and then Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA doesn’t share might values regarding the police community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to finance a joint anti-match-fixing program.
The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was designed to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal betting syndicates, but Interpol stated this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All external lovers, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and principles of the organization, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions associated with the deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the concepts, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials due to the fact result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why ended up being Interpol, having its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of police agencies, not aware of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The British press was crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The World that is secret of: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The title claims it all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC present affairs system, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper over a FIFA bribery scandal.
Inside it, Lord Triesman, the previous chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he don’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand may have been more in regards to the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than a quarter of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the united states, the nation that is only dared to keep the organization to task, it was too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
The FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger on a lighter note!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a motor car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But that is driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The police,’ he zinged.
Shortly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had chosen to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the time after their gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury had written out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned out to be a dud if the casino tried to bank it the following morning.
The Ritz normally looking for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.
This has been reported that the casino, which will be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a group of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively into the courts.
In line with the London night Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last year alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s protection is which he is a gambling addict and their staff needs understood this and stopped him from playing.
He wants the debts written off, but he’s on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife associated with Omani foreign minister.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her financial obligation. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken benefit of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a casino game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made conscious of her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino had been under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.
Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her visit towards the Ritz.
The judge said he had been certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to carry on gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very probably during her stay in London during the days or days after 3 April 2012. in governing in favor regarding the casino’
The judge within the Al Geabury instance, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, stated at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports were commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of mind regarding the time he destroyed the money and whether he had been in charge of their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction plus the claimant’s understanding of that,’ she said.