Specific measures are not well suited for our analyses: sensed HIV status of feminine lovers was just collected for вЂњmainвЂќ female partners, and just for a time that is limited.
Since the main MACS survey tool just permitted individuals to decide on one вЂњmainвЂќ partner, this restricted the salience of reaction alternatives for males who had been polyamorous, including those that might otherwise report having both primary male and main feminine partners. The MACS has not measured sexual identity; because MSMW may not identify as bisexual and because men who identify as bisexual may not necessarily have sex with both men and women our results should not be considered to apply specifically to bisexually identified men though it measures sexual behavior. Even though the current research has a fairly wide schedule (7 years), MACS individuals whom passed away or dropped away from (or had been censored from) the research before 2002, or those that reported intercourse with both women and men before 2002 or after 2009 had been excluded from analyses, therefore outcomes may possibly not be representative regarding the complete MACS cohort from 1983 to present. In addition, the MACS tool just permits participants to pick вЂњmaleвЂќ or вЂњfemaleвЂќ in assigning sex with their sexual lovers; guys that has transgender lovers could maybe maybe maybe not categorize them as a result in reporting their intimate habits.
This study provides empirical proof that transience and viral bridging notions might be, respectively, misconceived and overstated. 继续阅读